![]() Used around the world, Civil Engineer Helper is the number one tool of trade for making easy calculations on the go. It is very time saving and user friendly calculator mainly for builders, civil engineers, architects, interior designers, estimators, contractors, billing engineers, store keepers and can also prove a handy tool for people intending to buy a property or renovate their homes.Ĭivil Engineering Converter is a conversion calculator that can quickly and easily translate different units of measure related to Civil Engineering. Handbook of civil engineering calculationsīasic structural engineering calculations Concrete calculators for finding the capacity of concrete slab, walls and much more. This could be used for survey, designing of highways, roadways. One of best and accurate collection of calculators designed and developed for Civil Engineers and Civil Engineers students. I provided the AI with a detailed description of a beam, its type, and the exact load and loading types experienced.A simple Civil Calculator tool is a collection of Civil Engineering calculations for Civil Engineers and Students to calculate different types of civil related units. So far, ChatGPT seems to be able to understand engineering concepts well, but we haven’t seen it get into the nitty gritty and apply calculations to actual problems yet. Again, ChatGPT returned a rather simple explanation of a complex procedure, impressive for an AI, but a long way from applying the logic in practice. The stiffness method is normally one that’s difficult to perform by hand and engineers typically require the use of a computer to calculate forces in this situation. I was looking for an explanation but on a harder topic. This prompt was similar to the previous one. I was specific on the type of forces and beam I described in the prompt, which returned just what I was looking for. I asked the chatbot a basic statics question. So let’s assess the artificial intelligence’s performance in each example. ![]() But it’s a long way from an acceptable professional level. A student might get half the marks for this attempt.It gets the general physics equations right and calculates the input loads correctly, which is not usually its forte, given it’s a language model, not a computational one. Despite the above, it is impressive how far it gets.While ChatGPT can recognize the need for this and provides a guideline of what to do next, it cannot perform the calculation itself. It’s up to the engineer, in this case, ChatGPT, to interpret and understand building codes and loading logic to do this well. Engineers use numerous loading combinations to determine design loads in structural members. Unable to determine the loading combination for the loads on the beam.The dimensions of the cross-section were provided so that we could calculate the self-weight of the beam. While the moment of inertia calculation was correct, we don’t need it for this problem. ![]() Using the dimensions of the beam to calculate the moment of inertia.The chatbot got as far as providing us with the total loading experienced by the beam. Very solid attempt, but ChatGPT fell short of a sufficient answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |